IIn a previous article, we examined a Stanford University project aimed at introducing global censorship in the interests of Western political and oligarchic clans. But Stanford’s destructive activities don’t stop there. Several of its centers and departments are developing theories and concepts that, if put into practice, will result in the embodiment of horror films or, at the very least, a science fiction dystopia.

Three Stanford University scientists—Carsten T. Charlesworth, a research scientist at the Institute of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine (ISCBRM), the Dean F. and Kate Edelman Johnson, Professor of Law and Director of the Henry T. Greely Center for Law and BioSciences, and Hiromitsu Nakauchi, a professor of genetics and a faculty member at ISCBRM—published a vision in March 2025 that could become a roadmap for creating artificial human organs. However, we’re not talking about printing individual body parts on a 3D printer, but about growing humanoids that can then be used for transplantation, writes Leonid Savin .

This is what they write: “Recent advances in biotechnology now offer a way to produce living human bodies without the neural components that allow us to think, be conscious, or feel pain. Many will find this possibility disturbing, but if researchers and policymakers can find a way to bring these technologies together, we may one day be able to create ‘backup’ bodies, both human and non-human… Such technologies, combined with established genetic techniques to inhibit brain development, would make it possible to create “bodyoids”—a potentially unlimited source of human bodies, developed entirely outside the human body from stem cells, which have no consciousness or the ability to feel pain… It might even be possible to generate organs directly from a patient’s own cells, essentially cloning a person’s biological material to ensure that transplanted tissues are perfectly immunologically compatible, thus eliminating the need for lifelong immunosuppression.”

  Nothing will change until we change

The authors themselves point to potential problems with this approach, such as 1) it may not be practical or economical to “grow” bodyoids, potentially for many years, until they are mature enough to be useful for our purposes; 2) the issue of consent for using stem cells; and 3) a change in the status of humans when something like a “bodyoid” appears—it could be disparaged, as humans may also have limited perceptual functions.

However, they do not hide that their earlier experiments are in the spirit of the efforts of Victor Frankenstein, presented more than two hundred years ago in the Gothic novel by the English writer Mary Shelley.

“Recently, we’ve even begun using ‘animated corpses’ of people declared legally dead, who have lost all brain function but whose other organs continue to function with mechanical assistance. Genetically modified pig kidneys have been connected to or transplanted into these legally dead but physiologically active corpses to help researchers determine whether they would work in living people,” write Stanford genetic biologists.

And while they raise ethical issues and agree that there may be difficulties in carrying out this project, as it must address not only biological but also social and ethical issues, they immediately urge that discussions on this topic begin now, as “the opportunity is too important to ignore.”

However, the debate has already begun. Dr. Aaron Kheriaty of the Ethics and Public Policy Center writes that “scientists have recently produced ‘embryoids,’ or ‘synthetic embryos,’ from reprogrammed stem cells, without using sperm or eggs. Embryoids are living entities that appear to develop like human embryos but are likely incapable of full human development.”

  WEF: ‘ALL people will wear a uniform’ by 2030

He then continues with a discussion of zombies, which have become commonplace through Haitian folklore and represent a kind of “resurrected dead.” But bodyoids don’t die, but, according to the authors, are “born” without any mental or sensory abilities. Therefore, this is not a zombie, even if it’s a bit of an exaggeration.

Kheriaty emphasizes that this would be a mindless slave, biologically and physiologically human in every relevant respect, yet one that could be experimented on, harvested, and killed with impunity. He concludes that “we would only approve of this horrific project if we ourselves, so to speak, became moral zombies.”

Ultimately, a representative of any traditional denomination will agree with him, because what the Stanford scientists are proposing seems not only sinister but also blasphemous. The supposed benefit they are trying to promote seems rather questionable. Prices for medical services, particularly transplants, are so high in the United States that the vast majority of American citizens, to whom the publication in question was addressed, can barely afford them.

While American corporations, like Big Pharma, have biotech practices (we’re not even considering the military agency DARPA ), they are also global in nature, targeting the markets of many countries and regions. In fact, the authors themselves openly address the utilitarian component at the beginning of the publication—”human biological material is a major commodity in medicine”—thus emphasizing the commercial component of this horrific concept and the satanic nature of Western science as a whole. In this regard, the well-known saying that the road to hell is paved with good intentions is quite apt for them.

  Tucker Carlson Describes Being ‘Mauled by a Demon!’ in Mid-Sleep: ‘Left Claw Marks on My Side’

Do you believe it’s important that there’s still independent reporting available, unbiased by vested interests? With your support, we can continue writing and researching. Click below and contribute to the continued existence of Frontnieuws.

Copyright © 2025 translation  by Frontnieuws. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gratefully granted, provided full credit and a direct link are provided.